<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (6) TMI 17 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423176</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside and quashed the revisional order of the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Pr.CIT), concluding that the Assessing Officer had conducted proper inquiries, and the proposed reclassification of income lacked a solid basis. The Tribunal allowed the appeals of the assessee, emphasizing that invoking jurisdiction under Section 263 required demonstrating actual prejudice to the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2022 18:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=680740" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (6) TMI 17 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423176</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside and quashed the revisional order of the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Pr.CIT), concluding that the Assessing Officer had conducted proper inquiries, and the proposed reclassification of income lacked a solid basis. The Tribunal allowed the appeals of the assessee, emphasizing that invoking jurisdiction under Section 263 required demonstrating actual prejudice to the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423176</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>