<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Customs Broker&#039;s License Revocation for Employee Misconduct Deemed Disproportionate; Regulation 10(n) Cited by Enquiry Officer.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=63806</link>
    <description>Revocation of Customs Broker License - exporters have fraudulently availed excess ITC, by receiving the goods at inflated prices from their supplier - The enquiry officer has more reasonably concluded in the matter, and the appellant CB can at the most be held guilty for contravention of the Regulation 10 (n). Various High Courts have held that punishment for the offences should be proportionate to the gravity of offence. In the present it is not found that appellant was in any way responsible for any act of misconduct but is vicariously responsible for the acts of their employees, hence the punishment of revocation of licence is much harsh and disproportionate to the offences committed. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2022 07:42:51 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2022 07:42:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=680738" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Customs Broker&#039;s License Revocation for Employee Misconduct Deemed Disproportionate; Regulation 10(n) Cited by Enquiry Officer.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=63806</link>
      <description>Revocation of Customs Broker License - exporters have fraudulently availed excess ITC, by receiving the goods at inflated prices from their supplier - The enquiry officer has more reasonably concluded in the matter, and the appellant CB can at the most be held guilty for contravention of the Regulation 10 (n). Various High Courts have held that punishment for the offences should be proportionate to the gravity of offence. In the present it is not found that appellant was in any way responsible for any act of misconduct but is vicariously responsible for the acts of their employees, hence the punishment of revocation of licence is much harsh and disproportionate to the offences committed. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2022 07:42:51 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=63806</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>