<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (6) TMI 4 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423163</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals in favor of the appellant, holding that the appellant was entitled to Cenvat credit on cement and iron &amp;amp; steel items used for construction of storage tanks. The Tribunal relied on its previous decision in the appellant&#039;s own case and distinguished other judgments cited by the Revenue. The Tribunal also referenced decisions from the Bombay High Court and Chhattisgarh High Court to support its conclusion, ultimately setting aside the impugned orders in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2022 07:42:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=680722" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (6) TMI 4 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423163</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals in favor of the appellant, holding that the appellant was entitled to Cenvat credit on cement and iron &amp;amp; steel items used for construction of storage tanks. The Tribunal relied on its previous decision in the appellant&#039;s own case and distinguished other judgments cited by the Revenue. The Tribunal also referenced decisions from the Bombay High Court and Chhattisgarh High Court to support its conclusion, ultimately setting aside the impugned orders in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423163</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>