<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (10) TMI 36 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29074</link>
    <description>The court held that the provision for gratuity was deductible under Section 36(1)(v) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, for the assessment year 1972-73, with no change in the accounting method. The court also ruled that the mahimai collections were not taxable business income for the same assessment year, following Supreme Court precedent. Both issues were decided in favor of the assessee, with costs awarded to them.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 16:08:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=68071" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (10) TMI 36 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29074</link>
      <description>The court held that the provision for gratuity was deductible under Section 36(1)(v) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, for the assessment year 1972-73, with no change in the accounting method. The court also ruled that the mahimai collections were not taxable business income for the same assessment year, following Supreme Court precedent. Both issues were decided in favor of the assessee, with costs awarded to them.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29074</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>