https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302506 The appellate court allowed A.S. No. 105 of 1991 and dismissed A.S. No. 180 of 1991. It held that the plaintiff had no business dealings with the first defendant-Firm, the cheque in question was not issued for valid consideration, and the decree against the fourth defendant was incorrect. Each party was ordered to bear their respective costs. en-us Mon, 05 Mar 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 31 May 2022 16:34:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302506 The appellate court allowed A.S. No. 105 of 1991 and dismissed A.S. No. 180 of 1991. It held that the plaintiff had no business dealings with the first defendant-Firm, the cheque in question was not issued for valid consideration, and the decree against the fourth defendant was incorrect. Each party was ordered to bear their respective costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 05 Mar 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302506