https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302503 The statutory scheme for displaced persons required the Central Government to frame rules for urban agricultural land, because Sections 8 and 40, read together, showed that subordinate legislation was necessary to carry out the Act's purpose and to regulate compensation under legislative control. The existing rules did not extend to urban agricultural land: Rules 22 and 23 were limited to the property classes they expressly covered, and Rule 87 was only procedural. Press notes and the memorandum had no statutory force, could not replace rules made under the Act, and could not govern allotment or sale of this land. The executive directions were therefore inoperative against the petitioners. en-us Wed, 14 Sep 1960 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 31 May 2022 11:20:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302503 The statutory scheme for displaced persons required the Central Government to frame rules for urban agricultural land, because Sections 8 and 40, read together, showed that subordinate legislation was necessary to carry out the Act's purpose and to regulate compensation under legislative control. The existing rules did not extend to urban agricultural land: Rules 22 and 23 were limited to the property classes they expressly covered, and Rule 87 was only procedural. Press notes and the memorandum had no statutory force, could not replace rules made under the Act, and could not govern allotment or sale of this land. The executive directions were therefore inoperative against the petitioners. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 14 Sep 1960 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302503