<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (3) TMI 34 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29071</link>
    <description>Exemption under section 23(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 is available only when the assessee proves an inability to occupy the residential house because employment, business or profession elsewhere required residence in another building not belonging to him. The decisive requirement is a direct nexus between living elsewhere and the exigencies of work. On the Tribunal&#039;s findings, the assessee stayed with his father for personal convenience, not because of any business compulsion, and there was no material showing that he could not occupy the house while carrying on the partnership business. The exemption was therefore not available.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 16:01:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=68068" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (3) TMI 34 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29071</link>
      <description>Exemption under section 23(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 is available only when the assessee proves an inability to occupy the residential house because employment, business or profession elsewhere required residence in another building not belonging to him. The decisive requirement is a direct nexus between living elsewhere and the exigencies of work. On the Tribunal&#039;s findings, the assessee stayed with his father for personal convenience, not because of any business compulsion, and there was no material showing that he could not occupy the house while carrying on the partnership business. The exemption was therefore not available.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29071</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>