<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (5) TMI 1392 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423132</link>
    <description>Tax on transfer of the right to use goods depends on the situs of the contract, not merely on the location, delivery, or use of the goods. Where the lease agreements were executed at Chandigarh, Haryana lacked the requisite territorial nexus to levy tax under the Haryana Value Added Tax Act, 2003. The Tribunal&#039;s contrary view was held to rest on a misreading of the controlling law, and the lease rentals were therefore not taxable in Haryana on the facts stated.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2022 12:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=680624" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (5) TMI 1392 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423132</link>
      <description>Tax on transfer of the right to use goods depends on the situs of the contract, not merely on the location, delivery, or use of the goods. Where the lease agreements were executed at Chandigarh, Haryana lacked the requisite territorial nexus to levy tax under the Haryana Value Added Tax Act, 2003. The Tribunal&#039;s contrary view was held to rest on a misreading of the controlling law, and the lease rentals were therefore not taxable in Haryana on the facts stated.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423132</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>