https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302498 The Tribunal allowed the condonation of delay in filing the appeal challenging the anti-dumping duty extension notification. The appellant initially filed a writ petition before the High Court but withdrew it to pursue the appeal before the Tribunal. Despite a delay of 24 days due to the pendency of the writ petition, the Tribunal found the reasons provided satisfactory and granted condonation, stating the appellant was prevented by sufficient cause from filing within the stipulated period. The appeal was filed within two days of obtaining the certified copy, and a regular number was allotted. en-us Mon, 14 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 31 May 2022 06:33:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302498 The Tribunal allowed the condonation of delay in filing the appeal challenging the anti-dumping duty extension notification. The appellant initially filed a writ petition before the High Court but withdrew it to pursue the appeal before the Tribunal. Despite a delay of 24 days due to the pendency of the writ petition, the Tribunal found the reasons provided satisfactory and granted condonation, stating the appellant was prevented by sufficient cause from filing within the stipulated period. The appeal was filed within two days of obtaining the certified copy, and a regular number was allotted. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 14 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302498