https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302496 Disclosure of a pending FIR, without cognizance having been taken, did not by itself bar renewal of the petitioners' passports under the passport framework governing criminal proceedings. The Court treated the earlier foreign travel, expiry-based renewal request, and filed disclosures as supporting renewal rather than refusal, and granted no objection for renewal. It also accepted the petitioners' undertakings, including one petitioner's commitment to return within two months and the other petitioner's undertaking not to travel on that occasion, and on that basis permitted travel-related relief and directed renewal or issuance of the passports in terms of the applicable notification. en-us Tue, 03 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 06 Jun 2022 12:23:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302496 Disclosure of a pending FIR, without cognizance having been taken, did not by itself bar renewal of the petitioners' passports under the passport framework governing criminal proceedings. The Court treated the earlier foreign travel, expiry-based renewal request, and filed disclosures as supporting renewal rather than refusal, and granted no objection for renewal. It also accepted the petitioners' undertakings, including one petitioner's commitment to return within two months and the other petitioner's undertaking not to travel on that occasion, and on that basis permitted travel-related relief and directed renewal or issuance of the passports in terms of the applicable notification. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 03 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302496