<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (5) TMI 1388 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423128</link>
    <description>The court allowed the writ petitions, quashing the impugned notices issued under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. It emphasized that proceedings under Section 263 could not continue once the petitioners had opted for the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020, reiterating the scheme&#039;s intention to reduce litigation and provide peaceful resolutions for taxpayers.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Aug 2022 18:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=680581" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (5) TMI 1388 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423128</link>
      <description>The court allowed the writ petitions, quashing the impugned notices issued under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. It emphasized that proceedings under Section 263 could not continue once the petitioners had opted for the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020, reiterating the scheme&#039;s intention to reduce litigation and provide peaceful resolutions for taxpayers.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423128</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>