<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Taxpayer Must Prove Error in Prior Admission of Excess Stock; Income Additions Upheld Without Evidence.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=63768</link>
    <description>Excess stock found during the course of survey - It goes without saying that the onus to prove that the earlier admission at the time of survey was wrongly made, was on the assessee because it was he who was retracting. If this contention, not backed by any evidence, is removed from reckoning, there is nothing to justify the retraction. - Additions confirmed - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2022 08:45:54 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 May 2022 08:45:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=680561" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Taxpayer Must Prove Error in Prior Admission of Excess Stock; Income Additions Upheld Without Evidence.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=63768</link>
      <description>Excess stock found during the course of survey - It goes without saying that the onus to prove that the earlier admission at the time of survey was wrongly made, was on the assessee because it was he who was retracting. If this contention, not backed by any evidence, is removed from reckoning, there is nothing to justify the retraction. - Additions confirmed - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2022 08:45:54 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=63768</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>