<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (5) TMI 1370 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423110</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order due to the lack of jurisdiction by the Customs (Preventive) at Jaipur. The Tribunal directed the Customs Authority to return the seized/confiscated goods to the appellant or his authorized representative within 30 days.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2023 16:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=680554" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (5) TMI 1370 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423110</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order due to the lack of jurisdiction by the Customs (Preventive) at Jaipur. The Tribunal directed the Customs Authority to return the seized/confiscated goods to the appellant or his authorized representative within 30 days.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423110</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>