<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (5) TMI 1358 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423098</link>
    <description>The court acquitted the petitioner of charges under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act after the parties settled the dispute by payment of the disputed amount. Relying on legal precedents, the court invoked its power under Section 147 to compound the offence, setting aside previous judgments and directing the petitioner to deposit costs for acquittal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2022 15:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=680534" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (5) TMI 1358 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423098</link>
      <description>The court acquitted the petitioner of charges under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act after the parties settled the dispute by payment of the disputed amount. Relying on legal precedents, the court invoked its power under Section 147 to compound the offence, setting aside previous judgments and directing the petitioner to deposit costs for acquittal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423098</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>