https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302477 The High Court of Madras dismissed the appeal filed by the Revenue against the order of a Single Judge. The Revenue argued that an issue addressed in the appeal had been considered in a judgment by a Division Bench, which had overlooked a fact in a case involving Mr. G.Chinnadurai. Despite acknowledging the oversight, the Revenue contended that it would not impact the judgment in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax, Non Corporate Ward - 10(2) Vs. Shri Gumanmal Jain. The High Court accepted the Revenue's submissions and dismissed the appeal without costs. en-us Tue, 04 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 29 May 2022 21:23:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302477 The High Court of Madras dismissed the appeal filed by the Revenue against the order of a Single Judge. The Revenue argued that an issue addressed in the appeal had been considered in a judgment by a Division Bench, which had overlooked a fact in a case involving Mr. G.Chinnadurai. Despite acknowledging the oversight, the Revenue contended that it would not impact the judgment in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax, Non Corporate Ward - 10(2) Vs. Shri Gumanmal Jain. The High Court accepted the Revenue's submissions and dismissed the appeal without costs. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 04 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302477