<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 1589 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302478</link>
    <description>A person facing pending criminal prosecution may be permitted to retain a passport and travel abroad where the High Court has admitted the quash petition and stayed further proceedings. The expression &quot;concerned Court&quot; in the exemption notification was treated as the High Court, and the power under Section 5(2)(c) of the Passports Act, 1967 was read subject to Section 6(2). The notification under Section 22(a) was taken to permit exemption from the bar in clause (f) when the court allows departure from India. On those facts, the petitioner was directed to give the required undertaking and was allowed to travel abroad with the passport retained by him.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 May 2022 21:23:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=680526" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 1589 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302478</link>
      <description>A person facing pending criminal prosecution may be permitted to retain a passport and travel abroad where the High Court has admitted the quash petition and stayed further proceedings. The expression &quot;concerned Court&quot; in the exemption notification was treated as the High Court, and the power under Section 5(2)(c) of the Passports Act, 1967 was read subject to Section 6(2). The notification under Section 22(a) was taken to permit exemption from the bar in clause (f) when the court allows departure from India. On those facts, the petitioner was directed to give the required undertaking and was allowed to travel abroad with the passport retained by him.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302478</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>