<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Authority Finds Insufficient Injury to Extend Anti-Dumping Duties; Calls for Re-Examination of Potential Harm.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=63743</link>
    <description>Levy of Anti Dumping Duty - likelihood of recurrence of dumping and injury in the event of expiry of duty - the designated authority should re-examine whether the cessation of anti-dumping duty would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of injury so as to warrant imposition of anti-dumping duty for a further period of five years. It needs to be noted that the designated authority had recorded a categorical finding that cessation of anti-dumping duty would lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping and even with regard to the injury aspect, the designated authority did hold that cessation of anti-dumping duty would lead to continuation or recurrence of injury, but it further held that such injury was not strong enough to warrant continuation of anti-dumping duty for a further period of five years. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 28 May 2022 11:06:09 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 May 2022 11:06:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=680500" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Authority Finds Insufficient Injury to Extend Anti-Dumping Duties; Calls for Re-Examination of Potential Harm.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=63743</link>
      <description>Levy of Anti Dumping Duty - likelihood of recurrence of dumping and injury in the event of expiry of duty - the designated authority should re-examine whether the cessation of anti-dumping duty would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of injury so as to warrant imposition of anti-dumping duty for a further period of five years. It needs to be noted that the designated authority had recorded a categorical finding that cessation of anti-dumping duty would lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping and even with regard to the injury aspect, the designated authority did hold that cessation of anti-dumping duty would lead to continuation or recurrence of injury, but it further held that such injury was not strong enough to warrant continuation of anti-dumping duty for a further period of five years. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 28 May 2022 11:06:09 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=63743</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>