<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (5) TMI 1348 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423088</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal by the revenue and the cross objections by the assessee, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s order to quash the reassessment proceedings due to lack of concrete evidence and failure to meet jurisdictional conditions for reopening assessments beyond four years. The legal precedents and provisions under section 147 of the Act were crucial in determining the validity of the reassessment in this case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 May 2022 09:37:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=680471" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (5) TMI 1348 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423088</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal by the revenue and the cross objections by the assessee, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s order to quash the reassessment proceedings due to lack of concrete evidence and failure to meet jurisdictional conditions for reopening assessments beyond four years. The legal precedents and provisions under section 147 of the Act were crucial in determining the validity of the reassessment in this case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423088</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>