<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (5) TMI 1331 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423071</link>
    <description>The ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee, deeming the disputed addition of Rs. 7,40,505.00 invalid due to jurisdictional and procedural flaws. The assessment exceeded the limited scrutiny scope without proper authorization, rendering the addition unsustainable. The ITAT highlighted the AO&#039;s errors in selecting the case for scrutiny and expanding the assessment without approval, ultimately allowing the appeal and deleting the contested addition under section 68 of the Income-tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 May 2022 09:37:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=680454" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (5) TMI 1331 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423071</link>
      <description>The ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee, deeming the disputed addition of Rs. 7,40,505.00 invalid due to jurisdictional and procedural flaws. The assessment exceeded the limited scrutiny scope without proper authorization, rendering the addition unsustainable. The ITAT highlighted the AO&#039;s errors in selecting the case for scrutiny and expanding the assessment without approval, ultimately allowing the appeal and deleting the contested addition under section 68 of the Income-tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423071</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>