<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (5) TMI 1323 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423063</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal held that the reopening of assessment under section 147 read with section 148 of the Income Tax Act was invalid as it lacked tangible new material. Consequently, the addition of Rs.87,91,502/- under section 2(22)(e) of the Act was deemed unsustainable. The Tribunal quashed the reopening of assessment and allowed the appeal in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 May 2022 11:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=680446" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (5) TMI 1323 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423063</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal held that the reopening of assessment under section 147 read with section 148 of the Income Tax Act was invalid as it lacked tangible new material. Consequently, the addition of Rs.87,91,502/- under section 2(22)(e) of the Act was deemed unsustainable. The Tribunal quashed the reopening of assessment and allowed the appeal in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423063</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>