<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (5) TMI 1313 - SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423053</link>
    <description>The tribunal concluded that the appellants were not in possession of unpublished price sensitive information (UPSI) when they traded in the securities of IVL during the alleged UPSI period. The impugned orders were quashed, and the appeals were allowed with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 May 2022 09:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=680436" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (5) TMI 1313 - SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423053</link>
      <description>The tribunal concluded that the appellants were not in possession of unpublished price sensitive information (UPSI) when they traded in the securities of IVL during the alleged UPSI period. The impugned orders were quashed, and the appeals were allowed with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>SEBI</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423053</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>