https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423052 The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, finding the Appellant's arguments unsupported by substantial evidence. It concluded that the dispute raised was not genuine and was a tactic to evade liability, following the precedent set by the Supreme Court. The Tribunal emphasized that the Corporate Debtor had accepted and consumed the fuel without invoking any contractual remedies, and the counter-petition was dismissed for non-prosecution. The appeal lacked merit and was therefore dismissed. en-us Thu, 26 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 28 May 2022 10:39:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423052 The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, finding the Appellant's arguments unsupported by substantial evidence. It concluded that the dispute raised was not genuine and was a tactic to evade liability, following the precedent set by the Supreme Court. The Tribunal emphasized that the Corporate Debtor had accepted and consumed the fuel without invoking any contractual remedies, and the counter-petition was dismissed for non-prosecution. The appeal lacked merit and was therefore dismissed. Case-Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy Thu, 26 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423052