https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423039 In a cheque dishonour prosecution, the Delhi HC declined interference under Section 482 CrPC with an order refusing discharge. The complaint alleged that the accused signed a post-dated cheque issued towards consultancy fees, which was sufficient at this stage to attribute liability to the signatory. Pleas of resignation, missing cheques, and mala fide conduct raised disputed facts that required proof at trial, especially as the resignation was not shown to have been accepted or reflected in company records. The court held that, absent perversity or legal error, such defences could not justify quashing or discharge. en-us Thu, 26 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 28 May 2022 09:35:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423039 In a cheque dishonour prosecution, the Delhi HC declined interference under Section 482 CrPC with an order refusing discharge. The complaint alleged that the accused signed a post-dated cheque issued towards consultancy fees, which was sufficient at this stage to attribute liability to the signatory. Pleas of resignation, missing cheques, and mala fide conduct raised disputed facts that required proof at trial, especially as the resignation was not shown to have been accepted or reflected in company records. The court held that, absent perversity or legal error, such defences could not justify quashing or discharge. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 26 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423039