<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 1805 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302457</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the appellant&#039;s appeals, finding that the transfer pricing adjustment made by the AO was not justified. The ITAT concluded that the appellant had provided adequate evidence supporting services received from its associated enterprise and that the Transactional Net Margin Method (TNMM) was the appropriate method for determining the arm&#039;s length price. As a result, the addition to the appellant&#039;s income was deleted, and the penalty proceedings under section 271(1)(c) were contested successfully.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 May 2022 09:35:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=680419" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 1805 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302457</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the appellant&#039;s appeals, finding that the transfer pricing adjustment made by the AO was not justified. The ITAT concluded that the appellant had provided adequate evidence supporting services received from its associated enterprise and that the Transactional Net Margin Method (TNMM) was the appropriate method for determining the arm&#039;s length price. As a result, the addition to the appellant&#039;s income was deleted, and the penalty proceedings under section 271(1)(c) were contested successfully.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302457</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>