<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (7) TMI 1345 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302465</link>
    <description>The court quashed assessment orders under Section 153C of the Income Tax Act, 1961, due to hurried assessments without providing reasonable opportunities for defense. Allegations of violating Principles of Natural Justice were upheld, emphasizing the importance of affording a fair chance for cross-examination and personal hearings. The Assessing Authority was directed to reconsider the assessments, allowing representation by counsels, cross-examination, and timely proceedings. The petitioners were granted four weeks for assessment/reassessment, with the option to appeal if dissatisfied. All writ petitions were allowed without costs, and related miscellaneous petitions were closed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 May 2022 09:35:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=680415" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (7) TMI 1345 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302465</link>
      <description>The court quashed assessment orders under Section 153C of the Income Tax Act, 1961, due to hurried assessments without providing reasonable opportunities for defense. Allegations of violating Principles of Natural Justice were upheld, emphasizing the importance of affording a fair chance for cross-examination and personal hearings. The Assessing Authority was directed to reconsider the assessments, allowing representation by counsels, cross-examination, and timely proceedings. The petitioners were granted four weeks for assessment/reassessment, with the option to appeal if dissatisfied. All writ petitions were allowed without costs, and related miscellaneous petitions were closed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302465</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>