<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 1733 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302467</link>
    <description>Inter-se seniority in the Manipur Police Service Grade II cadre was governed by the service rules, which required seniority to run from the date of actual appointment to the cadre. The Court reaffirmed that no employee can claim seniority from a date on which he was not borne in the cadre unless the rules expressly permit it, and held that the year of vacancy or initiation of recruitment cannot be treated as the basis for seniority. The seniority list prepared on that basis was invalid, the promotees&#039; seniority over direct recruits was upheld, and the contrary approach in N.R. Parmar was disapproved and overruled prospectively.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 May 2022 09:35:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=680405" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 1733 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302467</link>
      <description>Inter-se seniority in the Manipur Police Service Grade II cadre was governed by the service rules, which required seniority to run from the date of actual appointment to the cadre. The Court reaffirmed that no employee can claim seniority from a date on which he was not borne in the cadre unless the rules expressly permit it, and held that the year of vacancy or initiation of recruitment cannot be treated as the basis for seniority. The seniority list prepared on that basis was invalid, the promotees&#039; seniority over direct recruits was upheld, and the contrary approach in N.R. Parmar was disapproved and overruled prospectively.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302467</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>