<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (3) TMI 15 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29037</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee on both issues. The premium paid for medical insurance policies on employees&#039; lives did not result in any benefit, amenity, or perquisite under section 40(c)(iii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Additionally, the salary payable to employees should be reduced by recoveries from managed companies when computing disallowable amounts under the same section. Each party was directed to bear its own costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 13:34:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=68034" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (3) TMI 15 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29037</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee on both issues. The premium paid for medical insurance policies on employees&#039; lives did not result in any benefit, amenity, or perquisite under section 40(c)(iii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Additionally, the salary payable to employees should be reduced by recoveries from managed companies when computing disallowable amounts under the same section. Each party was directed to bear its own costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29037</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>