https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422988 Writ jurisdiction cannot be used to compel inclusion of a specific khasra number in an area-based excise exemption notification where an earlier coordinate Bench decision had already concluded the issue. Relief not granted in the earlier writ proceedings was treated as impliedly refused, and judicial review under Article 226 was held not to extend to directing changes in a policy-based exemption scheme. The requested mandamus was therefore declined and the writ petition rejected. en-us Thu, 19 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 18 Feb 2023 15:04:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422988 Writ jurisdiction cannot be used to compel inclusion of a specific khasra number in an area-based excise exemption notification where an earlier coordinate Bench decision had already concluded the issue. Relief not granted in the earlier writ proceedings was treated as impliedly refused, and judicial review under Article 226 was held not to extend to directing changes in a policy-based exemption scheme. The requested mandamus was therefore declined and the writ petition rejected. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 19 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422988