<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (1) TMI 12 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29032</link>
    <description>The Court ruled in favor of rectification under section 35 of the Wealth-tax Act, emphasizing the retrospective application of legislative amendments and the Appellate Assistant Commissioner&#039;s authority to correct erroneous assessments. The judgment highlighted the importance of considering the nature of assets involved in the rectification process and upheld the decision to cancel the exemption granted for jewellery intended for personal use.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 13:12:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=68029" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (1) TMI 12 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29032</link>
      <description>The Court ruled in favor of rectification under section 35 of the Wealth-tax Act, emphasizing the retrospective application of legislative amendments and the Appellate Assistant Commissioner&#039;s authority to correct erroneous assessments. The judgment highlighted the importance of considering the nature of assets involved in the rectification process and upheld the decision to cancel the exemption granted for jewellery intended for personal use.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29032</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>