<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (5) TMI 1224 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422964</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, quashing the reopening of assessment in favor of the assessee. The Tribunal held that there was no failure to disclose material facts, the reopening violated the first proviso to section 147, and there was no new tangible material for a valid reopening, in line with the Supreme Court&#039;s ruling in the Kelvinator of India Ltd. case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 May 2022 14:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=680225" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (5) TMI 1224 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422964</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, quashing the reopening of assessment in favor of the assessee. The Tribunal held that there was no failure to disclose material facts, the reopening violated the first proviso to section 147, and there was no new tangible material for a valid reopening, in line with the Supreme Court&#039;s ruling in the Kelvinator of India Ltd. case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422964</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>