<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (5) TMI 1198 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422938</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT HYDERABAD ruled in favor of the Appellant, allowing the appeal against the rejection of the rebate application for Market Research Agency services. The Tribunal held that the services provided by the Appellant qualified as export of services under the Export of Service Rules, 2005. Additionally, the Tribunal determined that the principle of unjust enrichment does not apply to export transactions, further supporting the Appellant&#039;s position.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 May 2022 08:42:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=680199" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (5) TMI 1198 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422938</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT HYDERABAD ruled in favor of the Appellant, allowing the appeal against the rejection of the rebate application for Market Research Agency services. The Tribunal held that the services provided by the Appellant qualified as export of services under the Export of Service Rules, 2005. Additionally, the Tribunal determined that the principle of unjust enrichment does not apply to export transactions, further supporting the Appellant&#039;s position.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422938</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>