<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 1976 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302430</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the winding-up petition seeking winding up of the respondent Company under Sections 433(e), (f), 434(1)(a) &amp;amp; (c) and 439 of the Companies Act, 1956. The respondent Company ceased to exist post-merger into another entity, and the petitioner failed to follow the mandatory procedure of serving a statutory notice against the new entity. As a result, the petition was dismissed, allowing the petitioner to pursue legal action against the correct entity.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 May 2022 08:41:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=680188" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 1976 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302430</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the winding-up petition seeking winding up of the respondent Company under Sections 433(e), (f), 434(1)(a) &amp;amp; (c) and 439 of the Companies Act, 1956. The respondent Company ceased to exist post-merger into another entity, and the petitioner failed to follow the mandatory procedure of serving a statutory notice against the new entity. As a result, the petition was dismissed, allowing the petitioner to pursue legal action against the correct entity.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302430</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>