<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (5) TMI 1176 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422916</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that the lump sum payment received by the assessee should be treated as advance salary, not compensation on termination. Therefore, the assessee was entitled to relief under Section 89(1) read with Rule 21A(1)(a) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The appeal was allowed, directing the Assessing Officer to grant the relief as claimed by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 May 2022 13:13:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=680158" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (5) TMI 1176 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422916</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that the lump sum payment received by the assessee should be treated as advance salary, not compensation on termination. Therefore, the assessee was entitled to relief under Section 89(1) read with Rule 21A(1)(a) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The appeal was allowed, directing the Assessing Officer to grant the relief as claimed by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422916</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>