<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (5) TMI 1175 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422915</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals and dismissed the Department&#039;s appeal. The additions on account of unexplained expenditure on salary were restricted, and the additions for concealed net profit and undisclosed investment were deleted. The Tribunal upheld the addition for unaccounted purchases. The legal grounds regarding the validity of assessment proceedings under Section 153A and mechanical approval under Section 153D were not adjudicated due to the comprehensive adjudication on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 May 2022 11:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=680157" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (5) TMI 1175 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422915</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals and dismissed the Department&#039;s appeal. The additions on account of unexplained expenditure on salary were restricted, and the additions for concealed net profit and undisclosed investment were deleted. The Tribunal upheld the addition for unaccounted purchases. The legal grounds regarding the validity of assessment proceedings under Section 153A and mechanical approval under Section 153D were not adjudicated due to the comprehensive adjudication on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422915</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>