<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (5) TMI 1174 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422914</link>
    <description>The tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeals and allowed the assessee&#039;s cross-objections. The full deduction under section 80IB was upheld, and the additional addition for AY 2015-16 was deleted. The tribunal found no concrete evidence supporting allegations of profit shifting, siphoning of funds, or inflation of hospital receipts. The comparison of profitability between the hospitals was deemed inappropriate due to their differing operational natures.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 May 2022 18:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=680155" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (5) TMI 1174 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422914</link>
      <description>The tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeals and allowed the assessee&#039;s cross-objections. The full deduction under section 80IB was upheld, and the additional addition for AY 2015-16 was deleted. The tribunal found no concrete evidence supporting allegations of profit shifting, siphoning of funds, or inflation of hospital receipts. The comparison of profitability between the hospitals was deemed inappropriate due to their differing operational natures.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422914</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>