<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (8) TMI 47 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29017</link>
    <description>For deemed dividend under section 2(6A)(e) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, amounts set aside as depreciation or replacement fund are not treated as accumulated profits because they are not real profits; the depreciation fund was therefore excluded. A reserve merely transferred out of profits remains part of accumulated profits unless it is shown to be in the nature of depreciation or an equivalent replacement provision; the building reserve fund was therefore included.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 12:13:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=68014" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (8) TMI 47 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29017</link>
      <description>For deemed dividend under section 2(6A)(e) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, amounts set aside as depreciation or replacement fund are not treated as accumulated profits because they are not real profits; the depreciation fund was therefore excluded. A reserve merely transferred out of profits remains part of accumulated profits unless it is shown to be in the nature of depreciation or an equivalent replacement provision; the building reserve fund was therefore included.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29017</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>