<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (9) TMI 39 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29016</link>
    <description>The court held that the sum of Rs. 24 lakhs received by the assessee from Premier Automobiles Ltd. was a capital receipt, not a revenue receipt. The court did not address the alternative contention on assessing capital gains due to procedural issues. The Revenue was directed to pay the costs of the reference to the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 12:10:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=68013" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (9) TMI 39 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29016</link>
      <description>The court held that the sum of Rs. 24 lakhs received by the assessee from Premier Automobiles Ltd. was a capital receipt, not a revenue receipt. The court did not address the alternative contention on assessing capital gains due to procedural issues. The Revenue was directed to pay the costs of the reference to the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29016</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>