https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422902 The Court found that the respondents violated natural justice by adjusting the petitioner's refund without issuing a notice under Section 245 of the Income Tax Act. Despite a stay order on the demand, the adjustment was made prematurely. The Court held that the adjustment exceeded the 10% limit of the disputed tax demand and directed the respondents to refund the excess amount with statutory interest within four weeks. The writ petition was disposed of in favor of the petitioner. en-us Fri, 20 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 25 May 2022 09:09:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422902 The Court found that the respondents violated natural justice by adjusting the petitioner's refund without issuing a notice under Section 245 of the Income Tax Act. Despite a stay order on the demand, the adjustment was made prematurely. The Court held that the adjustment exceeded the 10% limit of the disputed tax demand and directed the respondents to refund the excess amount with statutory interest within four weeks. The writ petition was disposed of in favor of the petitioner. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 20 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422902