<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (2) TMI 37 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29014</link>
    <description>HC upheld the Tribunal&#039;s finding that unexplained cash credits shown in the name of a third party were rightly treated as the assessee&#039;s income from undisclosed sources. The court held the sole documentary material-a confirmation letter and a G.R. number-was insufficient, and the assessee precluded further inquiry by agreeing to decide on the existing record. On the facts found, the HC answered the reference against the assessee and in favour of the Department.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2025 15:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=68011" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (2) TMI 37 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29014</link>
      <description>HC upheld the Tribunal&#039;s finding that unexplained cash credits shown in the name of a third party were rightly treated as the assessee&#039;s income from undisclosed sources. The court held the sole documentary material-a confirmation letter and a G.R. number-was insufficient, and the assessee precluded further inquiry by agreeing to decide on the existing record. On the facts found, the HC answered the reference against the assessee and in favour of the Department.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29014</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>