<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (5) TMI 1151 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422891</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal, setting aside the CIT(A)&#039;s orders. The ITAT directed the AO to delete the additions and disallowances made in the assessment, including unexplained cash credit under section 68, bogus liability under section 41, and disallowance of lorry hire charges on an ad hoc basis. The ITAT found that the authorities had not properly considered the evidence provided by the assessee, leading to the decision in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 May 2022 10:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=680105" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (5) TMI 1151 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422891</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal, setting aside the CIT(A)&#039;s orders. The ITAT directed the AO to delete the additions and disallowances made in the assessment, including unexplained cash credit under section 68, bogus liability under section 41, and disallowance of lorry hire charges on an ad hoc basis. The ITAT found that the authorities had not properly considered the evidence provided by the assessee, leading to the decision in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422891</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>