<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (5) TMI 1147 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422887</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the reopening of the assessment under Section 148 was unlawful as there was no fresh material to justify it, relying on judicial precedents. Consequently, the additions and disallowances made by the Assessing Officer were invalidated. The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal of the assessee, primarily due to the invalidity of the assessment reopening.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 May 2022 18:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=680101" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (5) TMI 1147 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422887</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the reopening of the assessment under Section 148 was unlawful as there was no fresh material to justify it, relying on judicial precedents. Consequently, the additions and disallowances made by the Assessing Officer were invalidated. The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal of the assessee, primarily due to the invalidity of the assessment reopening.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422887</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>