<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (5) TMI 1142 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422882</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding the unexplained investment addition of Rs. 7,25,00,000/-. The issue of unexplained bank deposit addition of Rs. 1,66,00,000/- was remanded back to the Assessing Officer for verification. The additions on account of deemed rental income and undisclosed rental income were upheld. The addition on account of deemed dividend was confirmed. The issue of unexplained cash deposit addition of Rs. 25,89,356/- was also remanded back to the Assessing Officer for verification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 May 2022 23:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=680096" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (5) TMI 1142 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422882</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding the unexplained investment addition of Rs. 7,25,00,000/-. The issue of unexplained bank deposit addition of Rs. 1,66,00,000/- was remanded back to the Assessing Officer for verification. The additions on account of deemed rental income and undisclosed rental income were upheld. The addition on account of deemed dividend was confirmed. The issue of unexplained cash deposit addition of Rs. 25,89,356/- was also remanded back to the Assessing Officer for verification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422882</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>