https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302414 The court found the review petition maintainable after the dismissal of the Special Leave Petition (SLP). The counsel's statement about settlement without written consent was deemed valid, citing the authority of lawyers to act on behalf of clients. The dismissal of the SLP without leave did not bar the appellants from seeking further remedies. The court dismissed the appeals, emphasizing the need for written compromises to uphold the legal profession's dignity. en-us Thu, 04 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 24 May 2022 12:21:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302414 The court found the review petition maintainable after the dismissal of the Special Leave Petition (SLP). The counsel's statement about settlement without written consent was deemed valid, citing the authority of lawyers to act on behalf of clients. The dismissal of the SLP without leave did not bar the appellants from seeking further remedies. The court dismissed the appeals, emphasizing the need for written compromises to uphold the legal profession's dignity. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 04 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302414