<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>A case of un-necessary reassessment and harassment Proviso to S.139(1) inserted w.e.f. 01.04.2020 for compulsory filing of ITR in some cases is prospective and not retrospective.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=10412</link>
    <description>A proviso making return filing mandatory for persons with specified high value transactions is prospective and applies from its effective date; it cannot be applied to earlier assessment years. Consequently, entitlement to the Capital Gains Deduction under Section 54 is not automatically dependent on filing a return where, on the facts, the taxpayer had no taxable income and thus no filing obligation. The Tribunal directed that reassessment and denial of the deduction on retroactive application of the proviso were inappropriate.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2022 11:26:14 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 May 2022 11:26:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=680064" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>A case of un-necessary reassessment and harassment Proviso to S.139(1) inserted w.e.f. 01.04.2020 for compulsory filing of ITR in some cases is prospective and not retrospective.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=10412</link>
      <description>A proviso making return filing mandatory for persons with specified high value transactions is prospective and applies from its effective date; it cannot be applied to earlier assessment years. Consequently, entitlement to the Capital Gains Deduction under Section 54 is not automatically dependent on filing a return where, on the facts, the taxpayer had no taxable income and thus no filing obligation. The Tribunal directed that reassessment and denial of the deduction on retroactive application of the proviso were inappropriate.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2022 11:26:14 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=10412</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>