<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (5) TMI 1110 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422850</link>
    <description>Where execution and issuance of promissory notes are admitted, the statutory presumption of consideration under the Negotiable Instruments Act applies and the burden shifts to the defendant to rebut it by proof. A holder of a signed blank promissory note is authorised to complete the instrument, and absence of a thumb impression is not by itself fatal when execution is admitted. Visual comparison of signatures cannot displace admitted execution, and collateral evidence cannot replace the required rebuttal of the statutory presumption. The ratio supports the plaintiff&#039;s claim on consideration and validity of completion of the notes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 May 2022 11:15:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=680022" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (5) TMI 1110 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422850</link>
      <description>Where execution and issuance of promissory notes are admitted, the statutory presumption of consideration under the Negotiable Instruments Act applies and the burden shifts to the defendant to rebut it by proof. A holder of a signed blank promissory note is authorised to complete the instrument, and absence of a thumb impression is not by itself fatal when execution is admitted. Visual comparison of signatures cannot displace admitted execution, and collateral evidence cannot replace the required rebuttal of the statutory presumption. The ratio supports the plaintiff&#039;s claim on consideration and validity of completion of the notes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422850</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>