https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302410 State action withdrawing acquisition in favour of private entities who acquired land only after the acquisition process had begun was treated as contrary to the governing planning policy and legally unsustainable. The Court also found that the post-notification transactions, licence dealings and later settlements reflected a coordinated course of conduct influenced by factors extraneous to the statutory purpose, amounting to colourable exercise of power and fraud on power. On relief, the Court applied restitutionary principles to prevent unjust enrichment, protected bona fide third-party apartment purchasers, and directed consequential adjustments so that the public purpose was not defeated. en-us Mon, 12 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 24 May 2022 10:30:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302410 State action withdrawing acquisition in favour of private entities who acquired land only after the acquisition process had begun was treated as contrary to the governing planning policy and legally unsustainable. The Court also found that the post-notification transactions, licence dealings and later settlements reflected a coordinated course of conduct influenced by factors extraneous to the statutory purpose, amounting to colourable exercise of power and fraud on power. On relief, the Court applied restitutionary principles to prevent unjust enrichment, protected bona fide third-party apartment purchasers, and directed consequential adjustments so that the public purpose was not defeated. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 12 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302410