<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (10) TMI 1329 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302409</link>
    <description>Immunity under a voluntary disclosure scheme protects timely declarants from later inquiry into the ownership, possession, trade, transport, breeding, keeping, buying, selling, or exhibition of the declared exotic live species stock, because post-declaration scrutiny would undermine the scheme&#039;s purpose of encouraging disclosure and creating a unified record. The advisory&#039;s limited scope was also examined against the CITES framework, which permits stricter domestic measures and regulation of species beyond the appendices; however, any enlargement of the advisory remains within the respondent&#039;s policy discretion. Timely declarants are therefore protected, while expansion of coverage was left for consideration without a mandatory direction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 May 2022 10:30:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=680018" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (10) TMI 1329 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302409</link>
      <description>Immunity under a voluntary disclosure scheme protects timely declarants from later inquiry into the ownership, possession, trade, transport, breeding, keeping, buying, selling, or exhibition of the declared exotic live species stock, because post-declaration scrutiny would undermine the scheme&#039;s purpose of encouraging disclosure and creating a unified record. The advisory&#039;s limited scope was also examined against the CITES framework, which permits stricter domestic measures and regulation of species beyond the appendices; however, any enlargement of the advisory remains within the respondent&#039;s policy discretion. Timely declarants are therefore protected, while expansion of coverage was left for consideration without a mandatory direction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302409</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>