<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (7) TMI 15 - PATNA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29003</link>
    <description>Income received through the manager of the Court of Wards, Bettiah Estate, was treated as assessable on that manager, because the estate income was still being managed for the estate and the earlier basis of escheat had been displaced. The income was also chargeable at the maximum rate under section 41(1) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, because the persons ultimately entitled to the estate had not yet been finally ascertained and their shares remained indeterminate or unknown while the succession dispute was still pending. The assessment on the manager and the application of the maximum rate were therefore sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 11:29:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=68000" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (7) TMI 15 - PATNA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29003</link>
      <description>Income received through the manager of the Court of Wards, Bettiah Estate, was treated as assessable on that manager, because the estate income was still being managed for the estate and the earlier basis of escheat had been displaced. The income was also chargeable at the maximum rate under section 41(1) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, because the persons ultimately entitled to the estate had not yet been finally ascertained and their shares remained indeterminate or unknown while the succession dispute was still pending. The assessment on the manager and the application of the maximum rate were therefore sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29003</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>