<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (5) TMI 1100 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422840</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, setting aside the late fees levied under section 234E and condoning the delay in filing the appeals before the first appellate authority based on the principle of &quot;sufficient cause&quot; for delay condonation and the need to advance substantial justice. The Tribunal emphasized the interpretation of &quot;sufficient cause&quot; and the precedence of condoning delays to ensure substantial justice prevails.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 May 2022 10:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=679996" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (5) TMI 1100 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422840</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, setting aside the late fees levied under section 234E and condoning the delay in filing the appeals before the first appellate authority based on the principle of &quot;sufficient cause&quot; for delay condonation and the need to advance substantial justice. The Tribunal emphasized the interpretation of &quot;sufficient cause&quot; and the precedence of condoning delays to ensure substantial justice prevails.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422840</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>