<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (9) TMI 33 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28999</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, determining that the amount in question, sourced from the company&#039;s own funds and not from external borrowing, should not be deducted as a liability under Rule 19A of the Income-tax Rules. The Tribunal emphasized that the funds were not borrowed monies or debts owed to a third party, as they were drawn from surplus funds of another unit within the same company. The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, dismissing the petition and awarding costs to the respondent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 11:19:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=67996" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (9) TMI 33 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28999</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, determining that the amount in question, sourced from the company&#039;s own funds and not from external borrowing, should not be deducted as a liability under Rule 19A of the Income-tax Rules. The Tribunal emphasized that the funds were not borrowed monies or debts owed to a third party, as they were drawn from surplus funds of another unit within the same company. The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, dismissing the petition and awarding costs to the respondent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28999</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>